The television in the bedroom was an afterthought. It came out of the living room when we replaced that one, went upstairs because it seemed a waste to get rid of it, and sat there for a year being used about twice a month.
Then my wife broke her ankle and spent six weeks upstairs, and that afterthought became the most-used screen in the house.
What I discovered in those six weeks is that a setup which is completely fine as an occasional thing falls apart as a main thing, and it falls apart in ways you would never predict from using it twice a month.
The remote was the first casualty. It was the small one that came with the stick, it had no numbers, and when you are watching six hours a day rather than twenty minutes a fortnight, scrolling to find a channel goes from mildly irritating to genuinely infuriating.
The second was the wifi. Upstairs, through a floor, it had been fine for the occasional programme. Six hours a day, including the evening, and it started dropping quality regularly. I ended up running a powerline adapter up there, which cost about thirty pounds and worked immediately.
The third was the one I did not see coming: the stick got hot, because it was in a room with the door closed and the heating on, and a hot stick throttles.
All three of those are the same lesson. A setup gets judged on how it performs at its heaviest use, not its average, and the room you think does not matter is one broken ankle away from mattering a lot.
What I would do now, and did afterwards: put a proper box up there rather than a stick, on a cable if you can manage it, with a remote that has numbers. It cost about seventy pounds all in and the bedroom is now the room nobody complains about.
If you are working out what to put in a secondary room, this comparison is worth reading with heavy use in mind rather than occasional use, because the two lead to different answers.
Six weeks, thirty pounds of cable, and a remote with numbers on it.